EVE Search - Well isn't that something

All Channels

Out of Pod Experience

Well isn't that something

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.15 23:20:00 - [1] Originally by: 7shining7one7 Enter the portal through the two pillars... ET's don't exist Building 7 collapsed due to fire We can coexist in peace, when we become wise enough to choose truth rather than lies. ET's don't exist Hate to say it but dead planets like Saturn etc are common in the universe. Why travel all the way to sol just to see something that any alien race would probably find in there own solar system? Also what you are probably seeing in space junk. The reason it looks intelligently made is because it is. its made by us.. We have plenty of junk floating around in space
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.15 23:35:00 - [2] Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:35:46 Originally by: 7shining7one7 fyi we don't have nothing of that size in space.. it's many times bigger than the space station and you're telling me it's space junk that got torn off something.. dissapearing and reappering gigantic "space junk".. who would've thunk it.. it's the same with everything... people tend to NOT accept the logical conclusion but instead only accept the conclusions that fit with their current view of reality.. and then they call that logical and rational. see when you take a picture of something here on earth you have visual land marks to help judge depth and distance. In space it does not work the same. there for something will appear large then it is against the background.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.15 23:41:00 - [3] Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:47:46 Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:46:49 Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:43:21 Originally by: T3 Alt Originally by: David Kang Hate to say it but dead planets like Saturn etc are common in the universe. Why travel all the way to sol just to see something that any alien race would probably find in there own solar system? Also what you are probably seeing in space junk. The reason it looks intelligently made is because it is. its made by us.. We have plenty of junk floating around in space have no opinion on this either way but this is the dumbest thing I've read in ages How so??? NASA is always losing tools.. satellites and spacecraft parts. Source link I am guessing your pro alien? The sun, you would fit in with these people nicely.. why not move to England? its full of crazy`s like you.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.15 23:43:00 - [4] Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:43:56 Originally by: Cmdr Sy If They were bothered, They'd say hi. If They're not, it makes no difference whether They exist or not. Cmdr Sy you should know better then anybody else! There shear distant to travel to meet another intellectuality advanced race is neigh on inconceivable. To travel all that way just to look at a dead planet ... its madness...
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.15 23:51:00 - [5] Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:52:14 Originally by: T3 Alt Originally by: David Kang Originally by: T3 Alt Originally by: David Kang Hate to say it but dead planets like Saturn etc are common in the universe. Why travel all the way to sol just to see something that any alien race would probably find in there own solar system? Also what you are probably seeing in space junk. The reason it looks intelligently made is because it is. its made by us.. We have plenty of junk floating around in space have no opinion on this either way but this is the dumbest thing I've read in ages How so??? NASA is always losing tools.. satellites and spacecraft parts. I am guessing your pro alien? Right, so how do you know 'dead planets' like Saturn are common in the universe? How do you know they would find something like this in their own solar system (if they exist)? And you seriously think those massive things around Saturn (whatever they are) are space junk from earth? LOL You see we have this thing called Astronomy. And Astronomy has shown us that Rocky planets and gas giants should be common in the universe. In fact do not reply yet. I will get the NASA page up for you
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:00:00 - [6] Originally by: 7shining7one7 Originally by: David Kang You see we have this thing called Astronomy. And Astronomy has shown us that Rocky planets and gas giants should be common in the universe. In fact do not reply yet. I will get the NASA page up for you well you can take your astronomy and shove it up your arse if they've been lying to you and you think nasa didn't notice a gigantic object parked in space making the space station look like a midget? nobody's that stupid unless it's on purpose. If NASA had found something that wasn't terrestrial and was intelligently made it would be all over the media. Shining, really bud the whole world isn't out to get you.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:05:00 - [7] Originally by: T3 Alt Originally by: David Kang You see we have this thing called Astronomy. And Astronomy has shown us that Rocky planets and gas giants should be common in the universe. In fact do not reply yet. I will get the NASA page up for you That article only mentions Jupiter, not Saturn. You say 'planets like Saturn etc are common in the universe' as if it's certain fact... we've only recently began finding planets outside out solar system, nothing is certain. Jupiter is a gas giant just like Saturn You did do basic science in school.. right?
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:09:00 - [8] Originally by: clone 1 Originally by: Dantes Revenge Originally by: 7shining7one7 Building 7 collapsed due to fire This is really sick how people use these comparisons to fuel conspiracy theories. Comparing buildings that were on fire to the twin towers that were hit by large aircraft and pretending that the fire did all the damage. Now punch a large hole 1/4 of the way down the Mandarin hotel tower and try that again, let's see how fast it collapses then. Thing is, Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane. There are people much more educated than I, with degrees in structural engineering etc, that look at building 7 and go.. what the hell happened there? Its called kinetic energy , no doubt building 7 was structurally weak and when the planes flew into the trade centres the kinetic energy which was absorbed and travel through the building to the support underground causing earthquake like damage to weaken building around the area. also factor in the additional blast wave there was plenty of physics involved and reason for that building to collapse.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:11:00 - [9] Originally by: T3 Alt Edited by: T3 Alt on 16/02/2009 00:08:52 Originally by: David Kang Originally by: T3 Alt Originally by: David Kang You see we have this thing called Astronomy. And Astronomy has shown us that Rocky planets and gas giants should be common in the universe. In fact do not reply yet. I will get the NASA page up for you That article only mentions Jupiter, not Saturn. You say 'planets like Saturn etc are common in the universe' as if it's certain fact... we've only recently began finding planets outside out solar system, nothing is certain. Jupiter is a gas giant just like Saturn You did do basic science in school.. right? Ahhhh yes, all gas giants are exactly the same as jupiter, right Jupiter and Saturn are just names given to celestial objects. they are actually they same just a different collection of gasses. they both formed under the same circumstances.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:17:00 - [10] Originally by: Merin Ryskin Please stop lying. WTC7 was not hit by a plane, but it WAS hit by falling debris, as photographs clearly show. by any chance do have a linky to said photo.. I believe you 100%.. I just really cannot be bothered to go looking myself..
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:29:00 - [11] Edited by: David Kang on 16/02/2009 00:34:40 Edited by: David Kang on 16/02/2009 00:32:15 Originally by: 7shining7one7 Originally by: clone 1 Originally by: Dantes Revenge Originally by: 7shining7one7 Building 7 collapsed due to fire This is really sick how people use these comparisons to fuel conspiracy theories. Comparing buildings that were on fire to the twin towers that were hit by large aircraft and pretending that the fire did all the damage. Now punch a large hole 1/4 of the way down the Mandarin hotel tower and try that again, let's see how fast it collapses then. Thing is, Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane. There are people much more educated than I, with degrees in structural engineering etc, that look at building 7 and go.. what the hell happened there? Its called kinetic energy , no doubt building 7 was structurally weak and when the planes flew into the trade centres the kinetic energy which was absorbed then traveled through the building to the support structures underground, causing earthquake like damage to weaken buildings around the area. also factor in the additional blast wave there was plenty of physics involved and reason for that building to collapse. it's funny how no other buildings were affected by that awesome kinetic energy.. not to mention that the towers were built to withstand airplane impacts, they had to be due to their height, yet a plane flies into it, and a little while later the foundation of it is molten lava.. go figure.. Ok bud were now moving onto Thermal dynamics, Material science, and applied mechanics. Ok the material in question Steel melts or liquidises at 1370 degrees C (2500¦F). The fire from within the trade centre been in an enclosed fuel rich environment with highly flammable materials was around 1,000¦C. This would of caused the steel to soften, reap contort and to finally give way. It was designed to withstand a plane hitting it, but the modern materials inside the offices created a new problem they gave the fire plenty of fuel to burn for much much longer. If the fire had been quick burning and used all its consumable fuel quickly it would of been a different story they would still be standing. But due to prolonged fires and shear resources that fire had it was only inevitable that they gave way. Also shining after the collapse all surrounding buildings around the trade centre had to be structurally checked.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:39:00 - [12] Originally by: 7shining7one7 Originally by: Merin Ryskin Originally by: 7shining7one7 Edited by: 7shining7one7 on 16/02/2009 00:22:35 Originally by: Merin Ryskin 2) Evidence that would require more than five minutes with photoshop to fake. you calling official nasa images fake? This might be a relevant question if any of the images in the site you linked to actually were official NASA images. Unfortunately, they do not provide the official images, they provide copies of what they claim are official un-edited images. See if you can figure out how they could possibly edit them... Provide images from NASA itself (hosted on the NASA website), or at least from (and hosted on) a legitimate scientific site (IOW, not a conspiracy website), and I'll look at them. Until then, nobody is going to waste their time on photoshop fraud. Quote: also thx for demonstrating in that other thread how much of a horror of a human being you are.. you just couldn't resist spouting out your facist dictatorial wet dreams that would've made heitler **** in his pants. And another clueless moron who thinks that "Hitler" is a synonym for "any political position I don't like". I would ask you to explain precisely how my proposed actions are in any way in agreement with the morally offensive aspects of the nazi ideology, but I know you'd just dodge the question. 1. http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/casJPGFullS29/W00027526.jpg <- ? look before your leap. 2. ppl allready did that in the other thread. Shining please respond to my post on page one..
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:48:00 - [13] Originally by: baltec1 Originally by: Merin Ryskin Originally by: 7shining7one7 1. http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/casJPGFullS29/W00027526.jpg <- ? look before your leap. Awesome, a single picture. Too bad it isn't one of the more "convincing" ones. In fact, I'm starting to notice a pattern there... a few of them are linked directly from a NASA site, but all of them are terrible evidence, while all of the ones with something that couldn't easily be explained as a camera glitch (for example, the triangle UFO pictures at the top of the page) are hosted on their own website. Actualy that is just a mass ejection from the sun that just happens to be that shape. Nothing stange about it at all. Its called coronal mass ejection shining and it might just be. or it could just be an asteroid.
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:51:00 - [14] Originally by: 7shining7one7 Originally by: Merin Ryskin Would you like to post your physics equations and force diagrams proving this? Of course you won't. disprove it.. if you say it's nonsense then the ball is in your court.. you'll be denying how controlled demolitions look and what demolition experts know quite well.. but that's hardly a hindrance for you.. now we know your motives for protesting so much on this forum, you are a complete and utter facist, and you're proud of it too. Since when has Science and Engineering been fascist?? Yeah go figure shining we have this small thing in science called physic`s. Might really wan`t to check it out sometime
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 00:57:00 - [15] Edited by: David Kang on 16/02/2009 00:58:08 Originally by: baltec1 Nah its the sun. I saw several just like it in the last eclipse, even saw one that looked a bit like micky mouse Alot of the other pictures can be seen as asteroids. One looks just like the Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet. You good sir.. have hit the nail on the head. +1 pint to baltec1 Also shining I found your mothership! Do I get a new tinfoil hat now or????? how do conspiracy theorist reward each other???
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 01:04:00 - [16] Originally by: Cedric Diggory This thread is giving me coronal ejections... You must be new to a shining thread
David Kang	Posted - 2009.02.16 18:42:00 - [17] Originally by: ReaperOfSly Originally by: David Kang Edited by: David Kang on 15/02/2009 23:43:56 Originally by: Cmdr Sy If They were bothered, They'd say hi. If They're not, it makes no difference whether They exist or not. Cmdr Sy you should know better then anybody else! There shear distant to travel to meet another intellectuality advanced race is neigh on inconceivable. To travel all that way just to look at a dead planet ... its madness... Madness? THIS IS SATUUUUUUUURRRRN!!! Sorry. I know it's late, but I couldn't resist that one. i lol`d well played.....

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.